Florida sheriff pushes back after state orders takedown of Flock Safety cameras
Former Pentagon A.I. Policy Director Mark Beall discusses the growing debate over Flock Safety cameras and classroom AI bans. Beall addresses privacy concerns surrounding automated surveillance and analyzes the decision by New York City and Los Angeles schools to restrict artificial intelligence. He also shares insights on how AI developments could impact classical education.
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Former Pentagon AI Policy Director Mark Beall warned that expanding artificial intelligence surveillance tools, like Flock cameras, could turn American communities into a “China-like surveillance state” unless guardrails are enforced.
Speaking on “Saturday in America,” Beall argued that while this technology can have vital law enforcement benefits, clear rules and judicial oversight are necessary to protect the rights of Americans at home.
“We have to be careful that we don’t go too far to the other direction and create a China-like surveillance state, which is literally what AI capabilities will ultimately enable and are enabling right now,” Beall told Fox News.
TEENS ACCUSED OF DESTROYING FLOCK CAMERA UNTIL BATTERY EXPLODED, IGNITING FIRE NEAR HOMES: REPORT
Members of the Muslim Justice League and other activists march toward Flock Safety offices during a protest on Aug. 19, 2026, in Boston, Mass. The demonstration came amid scrutiny of the company’s license plate camera technology and its use by law enforcement. (Barry Chin/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
From destroyed camera poles to viral signs blocking surveillance lenses, some communities are pushing back against neighborhood surveillance cameras. Flock cameras are automated license plate readers used by law enforcement to record vehicle data that can aid criminal investigations. People in communities with the cameras have raised concerns about privacy and potential misuse by law enforcement.
Beall acknowledged that the technology can benefit law enforcement but said people’s privacy concerns are also valid. He urged a compromise and called for guardrails on how the cameras can be used, including strict rules and court oversight to prevent officers from abusing the technology for personal reasons.
FLOCK SAFETY CAMERAS NEED CONSTITUTIONAL GUARDRAILS BEFORE FURTHER DEPLOYMENT, TENNESSEE MAYOR ARGUES
“It’s tough to bring the message of compromise to the American people, especially when it comes to our constitutional protections,” Beall said.
“I think what we’re seeing across the board when it comes to artificial intelligence is that the innovation upside is so tremendous, but across all of these different use cases, including the Flock cameras, what we really need are strong guardrails, a strong policy that allows us to maintain those special values, the American founding principles that make this country so great,” he added.
FLOCK SURVEILLANCE SPREADS ACROSS THE SOUTH AS RED-STATE LAWMAKERS SEEK TO AX ‘1984’-STYLE TRACKING TOOLS
A pigeon perches on a Flock Safety camera, mounted high on traffic signal pole at the intersection of Chapman Avenue & Harbor Boulevard in Garden Grove, Calif. on Friday, Aug. 14, 2026. (Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
Lawmakers from both parties have raised similar concerns and called for rules governing the surveillance technology. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has proposed banning the technology outright, and Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., has pushed to cut federal funding for local installations.
In Florida, transportation officials have ordered law enforcement agencies to take down the license plate readers from state highways. They cited privacy concerns and reports of misuse of the technology.
DAVID MARCUS: CHINA TRIP A GLIMPSE INTO THE SURVEILLANCE STATE AMERICA MUST NEVER BECOME
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis criticized the cameras at a news conference Monday, saying, “If you want to get in your car, and you want to go down to Buc-ee’s in St. Augustine, it’s really none of the government’s damn business if you’re doing that, right? What we don’t want in the state of Florida is to have a digital AI surveillance state where everything we’re doing is being tracked at all times.”
He added that the technology has sometimes been useful but questioned where the data is going and how it is being stored.
“They claim that the companies aren’t going to misuse it, but no one’s watching that, and I know you can make some money selling cameras, but you really can make a lot of money if you can sell people’s data,” DeSantis said.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis speaks during a press conference at Florida International University alongside Jared Purdue, head of the Florida Division of Emergency Management, on Aug. 26, 2026, in Miami, Fla. (Al Diaz/Miami Herald/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
THE SURVEILLANCE CAMERA ON YOUR STREET CORNER: LAWFUL SPYING OR CONSTITUTIONALLY PROBLEMATIC?
In a statement to Fox News Digital, Flock Safety said they announced new safeguards, including cutting default data retention to seven days, making misuse detection mandatory for every customer and calling on the broader surveillance industry to meet those same standards.
In August, Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley addressed privacy and safety concerns in an interview with Fox News host Kayleigh McEnany.
“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley told Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”
EX-INDIANA DEPUTY CHARGED WITH FELONY FOR ALLEGEDLY USING FLOCK CAMERAS TO STALK GIRLFRIEND
He said the company is focused on ensuring the technology is used for good, including by recommending seven-day data retention limits and holding those who misuse the system accountable.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
“Today, it is too often that in Flock and in other technologies, there’s no regulation. There’s no accountability, and we think that’s wrong,” Langley said.
“We announced changes that required auditing, that required using our audit assistance tool, which detects abnormal behavior, and we’re calling on state regulators to focus less on banning this type of technology and more [on] holding our law enforcement community accountable,” he added.
